Analytical Matrix Historical Views of Leadership

Analytical Matrix Historical Views of Leadership

Resources: Part III of the Wren text and the Material: Analytical Matrix: Historical Views of Leadership

Complete the analytical matrix by grouping commonalities and disparities among three historical views of leadership in the Wren text.

Submit your analytical matrix.

Historical Views of Leadership

Commonalities	Disparities

Resource: Part III of the Wren text

Complete the analytical matrix by grouping commonalities and disparities among three historical views of leadership from the Wren text.

Note. You may need to add additional rows and columns depending on how you organize your matrix.

Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership Paper

The next step in scholarly reading and writing is critical evaluation, which is to apply a specific lens, context, or criteria to reach reasoned judgments and articulate clear claims based on credible evidence. Evaluation is shaped by the topic, the audience, and the lens.

In reading about leadership, you can evaluate recommended leadership models in terms of their application to specific contexts and goals. Evaluation is a combination of drawing on available elements and using critical thinking to reach conclusions. In evaluating leadership, you might look at who will use the model, why they would use the model, and what the goals might be. After evaluation, synthesis can be developed, which will be displayed in your Week 4 paper.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper critically evaluating historical views of leadership based on the analytical matrix you completed in Week 2.

Include the following in your paper:

• Review the commonalities and disparities of various historical views of leadership based on your critical analysis.
• Select a specific context or criterion to evaluate historical leadership theories or views, including alternative and conflicting perspectives.
• Describe the conclusions you drew from the critical evaluation, using well-reasoned judgments.

Use references to support the criteria, assumptions, or context of your evaluation. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.