ADM 634 Public Participation & McCutcheon

 ADM 634 Public Participation & McCutcheon

ADM 634 Public Participation & McCutcheon

Details:

Review the case of McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission.

In a 750-1,000 word essay, address the following:

Review and summarize the history of the McCutcheon case.

Summarize majority and minority opinion of the case. Which argument appears more legitimate? Why?

Discuss whether the McCutcheon decision either enhances or detracts from the public’s ability to interact meaningfully in the analysis stage of public policy. Defend your rationale.

Utilize the GCU library and/or the Topic materials to locate at least three relevant, scholarly sources to support your essay.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

 

GCU ADM 634 Week 6 Discussion 1

Which of the many evaluative criteria are the most important? Economic costs or efficiency? Policy effectiveness? Equity? Why do you think so? Are some criteria more important for certain kinds of policy questions than for others?

 

GCU ADM 634 Week 6 Discussion 2

In relation to the public policy of No Child Left Behind, what do you think the impact of this policy is? Would you make any changes? What are you basing your opinion on? Please provide two references for your information.

 ADM 634 Public Participation & McCutcheon

ADM 634 Public Participation & McCutcheon

GCU ADM 634 Week 6 Sugary Drinks Portion Cap Rule

Details:

Review the proposed ‘Soda Ban’ in New York City.

In a 750 to 1,000 word essay, address the following:

Discuss the social acceptability of proposed the ‘Soda Ban’.

To what extent should organizations such as the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) be able to determine the social acceptability of societal eating and drinking behavior? How does social acceptability play into the evaluation of public policy?

Is there an appropriate balance between perceived public health interests by public officials and individual autonomy and liberty? Why or why not? Defend your rational.

Utilize the GCU library and/or the Topic materials to locate at least three relevant scholarly sources to support your essay.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

 

GCU ADM 634 Week 7 Discussion 1

Discuss ways the Oregon Lottery and the Oregon Department of Education could have avoided the negative editorial written by the Oregon Center for Public Policy. Were there techniques used by these two departments that you disagree with?

 

GCU ADM 634 Week 7 Discussion 2

What are the positive aspects of public relations being used by government? What role can public relations play in national emergencies and furthering public policy?

 

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50
Use the following coupon code :
TOPCLASS